AuPS Logo Programme
Previous Next PDF

The POWERGENE consortium: Identifying the genetics of sprint/power performance in elite athletes

P.J. Houweling,1 F.C. Garton,1 POWERGENE Consortium,1,2 N. Eynon2 and K.N. North,1 1Murdoch Childrens Research Institute (MCRI), The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3044, Australia and 2Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 8001, Australia.

What makes an elite athlete dominate at a world-class level is a fascinating question. In combination with environment (e.g. training and diet), genetics plays a key role in elite athlete performance. For over 40 years researchers have analysed individual candidate genes in an attempt to understand the role genetics plays. Characterizing the athlete genome will be vital in understanding the role genetics plays in these individuals as well as highlighting novel genes and pathways which may influence health, aging and disease.

Critical aspects of professional athleticism (including discipline and mental training) are shared between athletes, however the physiological and genetic contributions in elite sprint/power and endurance competitors are different. Endurance athletes utilize high cardiovascular, metabolic and respiratory system performance to maintain a high relative oxygen uptake (VO2) to sustain muscle contractions. While sprint/power athletes require powerful muscle contractions for acceleration and speed, utilizing intramuscular creatine, ATP and glucose for energy (Eynon et al., 2013; Bishop et al., 2014). The majority of genetic studies have focused on profiling these characteristics in elite endurance athlete either via candidate gene or more recently, genome wide analyses (i.e. GENATHLETE). These studies have begun to highlight the polygenic nature of athletic performance and the importance of a large, well-controlled, population based research approach.

Of the genes which influence sprint/power performance, the α-actinin-3 R577X polymorphism has provided the most consistent findings. In Australian sprint/power athletes we have shown that the absence of α-actinin-3 (577XX) is significantly underrepresented in elite athletes (n = 107) compared to healthy controls (n = 436) (Yang et al., 2003). This association has since been replicated in over 14 sprint/power athlete cohorts around the worldwide. In addition, we developed an α-actinin-3 knockout (Actn3 KO) mouse to study the functional changes associated with the R577X polymorphism in vivo (MacArthur et al., 2007). The Actn3 KO mouse has been vital in determining the mechanistic changes in skeletal muscle - highlighting key changes in muscle metabolism (MacArthur et al., 2008; Quinlan et al., 2010) and the calcineurin pathway (Seto et al., 2013) that support the association in humans.

Over 200 polymorphisms have now been predicted to influence exercise-performance (with more than 20 associated with elite athletic status) (Eynon et al., 2013). It is therefore important to consider that no single variant accounts for athletic performance. Given the large number of candidates and variation in current association studies, the use of unbiased whole genome analyses are thought to provide a robust assessment of the athlete genome.

To further study the genetic contribution to athletic performance we have established an international consortium (POWERGENE) of sprint/power athletes and matched controls to perform a case-control study. To date, DNA from a total of 445 sprint/power athletes and 1200 population controls from nine countries (Australia, Belgium, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America) have been obtained for a discovery phase analysis. Using a combination of candidate genes and genome wide approach we will begin to delve into the genetic influences of elite sprint/power athlete performance. This ongoing project will highlight novel genes involved in human performance, providing candidates for replication in additional cohorts and functional in vivo studies using animal models to determine the mechanistic changes associated with these novel variants.

Bishop DJ, Granata C, Eynon N. (2014) Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1840: 1266-75.

Eynon N, Hanson ED, Lucia A, Houweling PJ, Garton F et al. (2013) Sports Medicine, 43: 803-17.

MacArthur DG, Seto JT, Chan S, Quinlan KG, Raftery JM, Turner N, Nicholson MD, Kee AJ, Hardeman EC, Gunning PW, Cooney GJ, Head SI, Yang N, North KN. (2008) Human Molecular Genetics, 17: 1076-86.

MacArthur DG, Seto JT, Raftery JM, Quinlan KG, Huttley GA, Hook JW, Lemckert FA, Kee AJ, Edwards MR, Berman Y, Hardeman EC, Gunning PW et al. (2007) Nature Genetics, 39: 1261-5.

Quinlan KG, Seto JT, Turner N, Vandebrouck A, Floetenmeyer M, Macarthur DG, Raftery JM, Lek M, Yang N, Parton RG, Cooney GJ, North KN. (2010) Human Molecular Genetics, 19: 1335-46.

Seto JT, Quinlan KG, Lek M, Zheng XF, Garton F, MacArthur DG, Hogarth MW, Houweling PJ, Gregorevic P, Turner N, Cooney GJ, Yang N, North KN. (2013) Journal of Clinical Investigation, 123: 4255-63.

Yang NI, MacArthur DG, Gulbin JP, Hahn AG, Beggs AH, Easteal S, North K. (2003) American Journal of Human Genetics, 73: 627-31.