AuPS Logo Programme
Contents
Previous Next PDF

Mechanisms maintaining kidney tissue oxygenation during renal ischaemia in anaesthetised rabbits

R.G. Evans,1 S. Michaels,1 G.A. Eppel,1 S.L. Burke,2 G.A. Head,2 J.F. Carroll3 and P.M. O'Connor,4 1Department of Physiology, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia, 2Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 8008, Australia, 3Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas 76107, USA and 4Department of Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202, USA.

We have recently shown that the kidney has a remarkable ability to maintain stable tissue oxygen tension (PO2) in the face of changes in renal blood flow (RBF) within the physiological range (O’Connor et al., 2006; Leong et al., 2007). According to the conventional view of kidney oxygenation, maintenance of homeostasis of kidney oxygenation is thought to be achieved almost exclusively through the ‘flow limited’ nature of kidney oxygen consumption (VO2). That is, because most oxygen consumption by kidney tissue is attributable to sodium reabsorption, which in turn also drives reabsorption of other solutes, renal VO2 often varies in proportion with glomerular filtration rate and thus RBF. However, this mechanism could only completely maintain homeostasis of kidney oxygenation if there is no mis-match between changes in renal oxygen delivery (DO2) and VO2. Therefore, we investigated the potential for percentage oxygen extraction by the kidney to increase during renal ischaemia, even in the absence of reduced tissue PO2.

Rabbits were anaesthetised with pentobarbitone (90-150 mg plus 30-50 mg/h) and artificially ventilated. Catheters were placed in the ear arteries and renal vein and a transit-time ultrasound flow probe was placed around the renal artery. DO2 and VO2 were calculated from the oxygen content of renal venous and/or arterial blood and RBF. Cortical tissue PO2 was determined by fluorescence optode. Urine was collected from the catheterized ureter. For electrical stimulation of the renal nerves (RNS, n = 15), the renal nerves were sectioned cranially and placed on stimulating electrodes (O’Connor et al., 2006). For renal arterial infusion of angiotensin II (n = 12), a catheter was placed in the renal artery (Leong et al., 2007).

Figure 1

The figure shows responses to RNS and angiotensin II infusion. Baseline values are within each panel. RNS caused frequency-dependent reductions in RBF (-44 ± 4% at 2 Hz) and DO2 (-49 ± 4%), but a smaller reduction in VO2 (-30 ± 7%). Angiotensin II reduced RBF (-37 ± 3%) and DO2 (-38 ± 3%), but not VO2 (+10 ± 10%). Despite mis-matched changes in DO2 and VO2, cortical tissue PO2 did not fall. Percentage oxygen extraction increased 1.4-fold during 2 Hz RNS and 1.8-fold during angiotensin II. Renal venous PO2 fell by -5.7 ± 1.7 mmHg during 2 Hz RNS and by -11.2 ± 2.0 mmHg during angiotensin II infusion. Neither renal venous blood PCO2 nor pH changed in response to these ischaemic stimuli.

We conclude that during mild renal ischaemia, induced by RNS or angiotensin II infusion, reductions in DO2 are not matched by reductions in VO2. But tissue hypoxia does not occur, because the kidney extracts a greater proportion of DO2, even in the absence of an increase in the PO2 gradient between arterial blood and tissue. We speculate that increased percentage oxygen extraction could be driven by changes in the counter-current exchange of oxygen and/or carbon dioxide between renal arteries and veins. For example, diffusional shunting of carbon dioxide from intrarenal veins to arteries may increase during ischemia, reducing the pH of blood in peritubular capillaries. This should reduce the affinity of haemoglobin for oxygen (the Bohr effect) within renal peritubular capillaries, so increasing delivery of oxygen to tissue. There is also a theoretical basis for diffusional shunting of oxygen to decrease during renal ischemia (Evans et al., 2008), which should increase delivery of oxygen to tissue.

Evans RG, Gardiner BS, Smith DW, O’Connor PM. (2008) American Journal of Physiology – Renal Physiology doi:10.1152/ajprenal.90230.2008

Leong C-L, Anderson WP, O’Connor PM, Evans RG. (2007) American Journal of Physiology – Renal Physiology 292: F1726-33.

O’Connor PM, Kett MM, Anderson WP, Evans RG. (2006) American Journal of Physiology – Renal Physiology 290: F688-94.